SOLUTION NMR
| NMR Experiment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
| 1 | 2D NOESY | 3-4mM ILBP/glycocholate complex | 20mM phosphate; 0.05% azide; 90% H2O, 10% D2O | 20mM KH2PO4 | 5.0 | ambient | 310 | |
| 2 | 2D 1H/13C-NOESY | 3-4mM ILBP/glycocholate complex | 20mM phosphate; 0.05% azide; 90% H2O, 10% D2O | 20mM KH2PO4 | 5.0 | ambient | 310 | |
| 3 | 2D TOCSY | 3-4mM ILBP/glycocholate complex | 20mM phosphate; 0.05% azide; 90% H2O, 10% D2O | 20mM KH2PO4 | 5.0 | ambient | 310 | |
| NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
| 1 | Bruker | DMX | 500 |
| 2 | Bruker | DMX | 600 |
| 3 | Bruker | DRX | 800 |
| NMR Refinement | ||
|---|---|---|
| Method | Details | Software |
| distance geometry and simulated annealing | the ligand was docked into the protein structure by simulated annealing | XwinNMR |
| NMR Ensemble Information | |
|---|---|
| Conformer Selection Criteria | structures with the lowest energies after docking of ligand |
| Conformers Calculated Total Number | 8 |
| Conformers Submitted Total Number | 5 |
| Representative Model | 1 (lowest energy) |
| Computation: NMR Software | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
| 1 | collection | XwinNMR | 1.3 | Bruker |
| 2 | data analysis | AURELIA | 2.1 | Bruker |
| 3 | data analysis | Felix | 95.0 | MSI |
| 4 | structure solution | DIANA | 2.8 | Guenthert |
| 5 | refinement | SYBYL | 6.4 | Tripos |
