8VEV | pdb_00008vev

Structure of a mouse IgG antibody antigen-binding fragment (Fab) targeting N6-methyladenosine (m6A), an RNA modification, m6A nucleoside ligand


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 3.06 Å
  • R-Value Free: 
    0.253 (Depositor), 0.255 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.224 (Depositor), 0.227 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 
    0.225 (Depositor) 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.2 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

In silico lambda-dynamics predicts protein binding specificities to modified RNAs.

Angelo, M.Zhang, W.Vilseck, J.Z.Aoki, S.T.

(2025) Nucleic Acids Res 53

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaf166
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    8SIP, 8TCA, 8VEV

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    RNA modifications shape gene expression through a variety of chemical changes to canonical RNA bases. Although numbering in the hundreds, only a few RNA modifications are well characterized, in part due to the absence of methods to identify modification sites. Antibodies remain a common tool to identify modified RNA and infer modification sites through straightforward applications. However, specificity issues can result in off-target binding and confound conclusions. This work utilizes in silico λ-dynamics to efficiently estimate binding free energy differences of modification-targeting antibodies between a variety of naturally occurring RNA modifications. Crystal structures of inosine and N6-methyladenosine (m6A) targeting antibodies bound to their modified ribonucleosides were determined and served as structural starting points. λ-Dynamics was utilized to predict RNA modifications that permit or inhibit binding to these antibodies. In vitro RNA-antibody binding assays supported the accuracy of these in silico results. High agreement between experimental and computed binding propensities demonstrated that λ-dynamics can serve as a predictive screen for antibody specificity against libraries of RNA modifications. More importantly, this strategy is an innovative way to elucidate how hundreds of known RNA modifications interact with biological molecules without the limitations imposed by in vitro or in vivo methodologies.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) binding IgG Fab, heavy chainA,
C,
E [auth H]
221Mus musculusMutation(s): 0 
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 2
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) binding IgG Fab, light chainB,
D,
F [auth L]
215Mus musculusMutation(s): 0 
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 4 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
6MD (Subject of Investigation/LOI)
Query on 6MD

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
J [auth C],
R [auth H]
N-methyladenosine
C11 H15 N5 O4
VQAYFKKCNSOZKM-IOSLPCCCSA-N
PEG
Query on PEG

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
G [auth A]DI(HYDROXYETHYL)ETHER
C4 H10 O3
MTHSVFCYNBDYFN-UHFFFAOYSA-N
SO4
Query on SO4

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
H [auth B]
I [auth B]
K [auth C]
L [auth D]
M [auth D]
H [auth B],
I [auth B],
K [auth C],
L [auth D],
M [auth D],
N [auth D],
O [auth H],
P [auth H],
Q [auth H],
T [auth L],
U [auth L],
V [auth L]
SULFATE ION
O4 S
QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L
CL
Query on CL

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
S [auth H]CHLORIDE ION
Cl
VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 3.06 Å
  • R-Value Free:  0.253 (Depositor), 0.255 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work:  0.224 (Depositor), 0.227 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.225 (Depositor) 
Space Group: P 21 21 21
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 83.64α = 90
b = 128.377β = 90
c = 150.476γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
PHENIXrefinement
autoPROCdata processing
Aimlessdata scaling
autoPROCdata reduction
MOLREPphasing
Cootmodel building

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History & Funding Information

Deposition Data

  • Released Date: 2024-02-07 
  • Deposition Author(s): Aoki, S.T.

Funding OrganizationLocationGrant Number
Not funded--

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2024-02-07
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2024-10-23
    Changes: Structure summary
  • Version 1.2: 2025-08-20
    Changes: Database references