2MV0 | pdb_00002mv0

Solution NMR Structure of Maltose-binding protein from Escherichia coli, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG) Target ER690

SOLUTION NMR

---

NMR Experiment
Experiment	Type	Sample Contents	Solvent	Ionic Strength	pH	Pressure	Temperature (K)	Spectrometer
1	2D 1H-15N HSQC	1.05 mM ER690.005	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.2	ambient	310
2	2D 1H-13C HSQC	1.05 mM ER690.005	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.2	ambient	310
3	3D HNCO	1.05 mM ER690.005	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.2	ambient	310
4	3D CBCA(CO)NH	1.05 mM ER690.005	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.2	ambient	310
5	3D HNCACB	1.05 mM ER690.005	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.2	ambient	310
6	3D 1H-13C NOESY	1.05 mM ER690.005	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.2	ambient	310
7	3D 1H-15N NOESY	1.05 mM ER690.005	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.2	ambient	310
8	3D HCCH-TOCSY	1.05 mM ER690.005	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.2	ambient	310
9	3D (h)NNH HSQC-NOESY-HSQC	1.05 mM ER690.005	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.2	ambient	310
10	3D (h)CCH HSQC-NOESY-HSQC	1.05 mM ER690.005	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.2	ambient	310
11	3D (h)CNH HSQC-NOESY-HSQC	1.05 mM ER690.005	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.2	ambient	310
12	3D (h)NCH HSQC-NOESY-HSQC	1.05 mM ER690.005	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.2	ambient	310
13	2D 1H-13C HSQC	1.05 mM ER690.005	90% H2O/10% D2O		7.2	ambient	310

NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer	Manufacturer	Model	Field Strength
1	Bruker	AVANCE	800

NMR Refinement
Method	Details	Software
simulated annealing, molecular dynamics		CNS

NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria	structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number	100
Conformers Submitted Total Number	10
Representative Model	1 (lowest energy)

Computation: NMR Software
#	Classification	Version	Software Name	Author
1	refinement	CNS		Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
2	structure solution	CNS		Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
3	geometry optimization	CNS		Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
4	refinement	CYANA	3.0	Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
5	geometry optimization	CYANA	3.0	Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
6	structure solution	CYANA	3.0	Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
7	data analysis	AutoStructure	2.1	Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
8	refinement	AutoStructure	2.1	Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
9	data analysis	AutoAssign	2.1	Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
10	chemical shift assignment	AutoAssign	2.1	Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
11	processing	NMRPipe		Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
12	data analysis	XEASY		Bartels et al.
13	peak picking	XEASY		Bartels et al.
14	chemical shift assignment	XEASY		Bartels et al.
15	collection	TopSpin		Bruker Biospin
16	collection	VnmrJ		Varian
17	chemical shift assignment	PINE		Bahrami, Markley, Assadi, and Eghbalnia
18	data analysis	Sparky		Goddard
19	geometry optimization	TALOS+		Shen, Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
20	geometry optimization	PALES		PALES (Zweckstetter, Bax)
21	geometry optimization	REDCAT		Valafar, Prestegard
22	structure validation	PSVS		Bhattacharya, Montelione
23	refinement	Rosetta		Baker